Visit Tedd Riggs's column >>

TEDD RIGGS

Recalled by factory for repairs
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 1; Links Seeded: 456
Member Since: 9/2007

Mpls Police Shoot Knife-Wielding Woman after Taser Ineffective

advertisement

MINNEAPOLIS -- Minneapolis police shot a woman armed with a knife at a Minneapolis apartment building early Tuesday morning.

Responding to a call of an armed person on the 300 block of W. Franklin Ave, officers shot the woman after a Taser was ineffective in containing her.

The woman refused to comply with officers, who then used the Taser. When she approahed the officers with the knife in hand, officers were forced to open fire.

She was taken to HCMC, her condition is unknown.

The officers involved are on paid administrative leave following the incident.

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
52
13
7.5
{"commentId":1513370,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

A working Taser will stop a person. The CEO of Taser International admitted that they had a high failure rate. Was this a faulty Taser or one not charged ? No need to shoot someone for using a knife, the police should have been able to take care of that in most cases and should also at least have checked out the Taser.

{"commentId":1513370,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:03 AM EST
{"commentId":1513760,"authorDomain":"clearcache"}

I'm not sure if I agree with you completely here, Tedd. A knife is a deadly weapon. If someone comes at me with a knife and I have a gun, you can bet that I'm going to defend myself in as effective a manner as possible.

{"commentId":1513760,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"clearcache"}
  • 4 votes
#1.1 - Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:08 AM EST
{"commentId":1513785,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

Very true and of course if depends on the case. I was just thinking two officers against one woman and guessing maybe a kitchen knife. However I have never been on the other (or either end..) of a knife fight. So perhaps not the best comment I have ever made....

{"commentId":1513785,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
  • 1 vote
#1.2 - Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:15 AM EST
{"commentId":1513893,"authorDomain":"stacym"}

What I found odd about the story was that it appears they only tasered her once.

We have many stories of people that were tasered multiple times from the police for doing pretty unimpressive things, no weapons involved. But this lady runs at them with a knife and they only taser her one time before opening fire?

Doesn't really help the idea that tasers are meant to decrease injury to suspects in situations like this.

Clipped to Question Authority and Minnesota Newsviners.

{"commentId":1513893,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"stacym"}
  • 3 votes
#1.3 - Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:42 AM EST
{"commentId":1513913,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

It could have been a Taser that misfired, or was not charged up or a faulty one. I found that odd also. If a Taser is working, its pretty rare that it does not stop someone right away.

{"commentId":1513913,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
  • 2 votes
#1.4 - Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:47 AM EST
{"commentId":1514244,"authorDomain":"clearcache"}

I agree. If the Taser failed, it could be that their only option was the use of their handguns, unfortunate as that may be.

{"commentId":1514244,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"clearcache"}
  • 4 votes
#1.5 - Wed Feb 27, 2008 12:13 PM EST
{"commentId":1514823,"authorDomain":"walketim"}

When I was in law enforcement we learned how to subdue an attacker with our nightsticks whacked hard on the side of the kneecaps. Of course, back then, we considered sacrifice and bravery in our public service attitude. The woman that was shot probably needed help, not shot.

{"commentId":1514823,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"walketim"}
  • 2 votes
#1.6 - Wed Feb 27, 2008 2:48 PM EST
{"commentId":1514982,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

Sounded like some help would have been useful in this case.

{"commentId":1514982,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
  • 1 vote
#1.7 - Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:34 PM EST
{"commentId":1516487,"authorDomain":"patsym546"}

Many times if someone is on drugs, particularly meth or pcp, tasers do not stop them...they don't even appear to feel it. I do feel two (or more) officers could have stopped her without shooting her.

{"commentId":1516487,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"patsym546"}
  • 1 vote
#1.8 - Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:12 AM EST
{"commentId":1517061,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

Somebody high on meth, all bets are off on what works and what does not. However my gut feeling is that she still would have been stopped be a Taser and in this case, either the police missed her or the taser did not work. But if did not call for shotting her either.

{"commentId":1517061,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
  • 2 votes
#1.9 - Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:29 AM EST
{"commentId":1517501,"authorDomain":"walketim"}
Many times if someone is on drugs, particularly meth or pcp, tasers do not stop them...they don't even appear to feel it. I do feel two (or more) officers could have stopped her without shooting her.

As well, your risk of dying is much greater when your heart is already racing.

{"commentId":1517501,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"walketim"}
  • 1 vote
#1.10 - Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:25 AM EST
{"commentId":1517576,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

Thats true too, all the more risk you take. Not a wise idea.

{"commentId":1517576,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
  • 1 vote
#1.11 - Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:42 AM EST
{"commentId":1523774,"authorDomain":"Pasi"}
PasiDeleted
{"commentId":1524567,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

Very interesting to hear and thanks alot for that Pasi !

{"commentId":1524567,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
  • 2 votes
#1.13 - Fri Feb 29, 2008 5:12 PM EST
{"commentId":1529008,"authorDomain":"roybatty"}

If the police didn't have the Taser, all they would have left to defend themselves were the guns.

If the Taser didn't work, there was no recourse. I'm assuming though that they aimed for the arms or legs.....

From what I've read it was a good call.

{"commentId":1529008,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"roybatty"}
  • 3 votes
#1.14 - Sat Mar 1, 2008 7:39 PM EST
{"commentId":1529041,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

I am glad I was not the one answering that door and facing the sharp end of a knife !

{"commentId":1529041,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
  • 2 votes
#1.15 - Sat Mar 1, 2008 7:47 PM EST
{"commentId":1529571,"authorDomain":"DrKnow"}

I was one of the police 'sharp shooters.' The idea that cops should shoot for an arm or a leg does not understand that you have to be aware of where your shot goes if you miss. If you shoot someone, aim for the center of mass. The bullet is more likely to hit target and less likely to pass through. A 9mm bullet to an arm or leg is more likely to make the target more dangerous than incapacitate. Pass through is highly likely. A complete miss is even more likely.

{"commentId":1529571,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"DrKnow"}
  • 4 votes
#1.16 - Sat Mar 1, 2008 10:32 PM EST
{"commentId":1529599,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

hee hee, do I have a target for you....

{"commentId":1529599,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
  • 1 vote
#1.17 - Sat Mar 1, 2008 10:42 PM EST
Reply
{"commentId":1513402,"authorDomain":"DrKnow"}

How many cops were there? Sounds like more than one.

{"commentId":1513402,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"DrKnow"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:22 AM EST
{"commentId":1513445,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

All it said was "officers", not much detail. So I am assuming at least two.

{"commentId":1513445,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
  • 1 vote
#2.1 - Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:37 AM EST
Reply
{"commentId":1513406,"authorDomain":"bigmomma"}

Tedd, methinks you're "taser-crazy" today....;-)

{"commentId":1513406,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"bigmomma"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#3 - Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:23 AM EST
{"commentId":1513441,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

I set up a Google Alert for "Taser" and got 22 emails !!!

{"commentId":1513441,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
  • 2 votes
#3.1 - Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:37 AM EST
{"commentId":1513474,"authorDomain":"bigmomma"}

Ok, the world is taser crazy!

I guess that's no surprise to anyone huh?

{"commentId":1513474,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"bigmomma"}
  • 2 votes
#3.2 - Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:44 AM EST
{"commentId":1513505,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

Its ok to see I am Crazy....why would I be on Newsvine at 5:49 am and not in bed ?????

{"commentId":1513505,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
  • 2 votes
#3.3 - Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:49 AM EST
{"commentId":1513525,"authorDomain":"bigmomma"}

I'm in there with you I seeded my first today at 5:55am.... (shameless plug)....

{"commentId":1513525,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"bigmomma"}
  • 2 votes
#3.4 - Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:57 AM EST
{"commentId":1513556,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

Heck that is late...Did you see my first ?

Seeded on Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:45 AM PST (Kansas.com)

1 hour, 10 mins, earlier.......My nose and head are a mess...ugh..could not sleep..

{"commentId":1513556,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
  • 2 votes
#3.5 - Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:06 AM EST
{"commentId":1513571,"authorDomain":"bigmomma"}

Er.....Time zones?.....

{"commentId":1513571,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"bigmomma"}
  • 2 votes
#3.6 - Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:12 AM EST
{"commentId":1513601,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

I am on PST, you are on a different one, but still an hour different. Newsvine adjusts the Time Zone based on where you log in from.

{"commentId":1513601,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
  • 2 votes
#3.7 - Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:21 AM EST
Reply
{"commentId":1514442,"authorDomain":"walketim"}

Someone shoots me or my family with a taser I will kill them.

{"commentId":1514442,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"walketim"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#4 - Wed Feb 27, 2008 12:58 PM EST
{"commentId":1518031,"authorDomain":"patsym546"}

The latest I read on this implies the officer Tasered her because she turned to a family member with a knife and they felt the family members life was in danger..the family said she did NOT have a knife in her hand at the time..

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/20/BAG0V59J0.DTL

{"commentId":1518031,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"patsym546"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#5 - Thu Feb 28, 2008 12:25 PM EST
{"commentId":1518267,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
but had not been holding the knife when she was shot in the back.

When is a person a threat when they have their back turned towards you ? That sounds rather odd....

{"commentId":1518267,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
  • 2 votes
#5.1 - Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:19 PM EST
{"commentId":1522619,"authorDomain":"jamesmirick"}

When they're threatening someone else, in front of them.

{"commentId":1522619,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"jamesmirick"}
    #5.2 - Fri Feb 29, 2008 11:18 AM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":1522530,"authorDomain":"jamesmirick"}

    Just completed Taser training, so let me note:

    1. If the Taser didn't work, the darts didn't get in, or even close. The charge should be able to jump an inch gap and still shock the subject.

    2. Tasers can't be reloaded quickly, they are a one-shot device if the darts miss. "Multiple Taser shots" refer to someone who has the darts in them, isn't complying, and gets another 5-second burst.

    3. Tasers don't electrocute someone, they just lock up their muscles temporarily so the officers can apply other restraints. Tasers are sometimes viewed as lightning bolts from heaven but they are far from it. We Taser people regularly in training in my department (I am a reserve officer), they find it distinctly not fun but hardly the end of the world.

    4. Tasers are vastly preferable to shooting someone, but someone with a knife, near other people or officers, depending on their behavior, is threatening deadly force and needs to be immediately subdued.

    5. I'm not sure what statement by Taser is stating that they have a high misfire or failure rate; we have never had a misfire. You do, however, have to hit the subject and get penetration.

    FYI, Tasers are full of software and have to have their ROMs updated by downloading periodically.

    Also, re: TBone, would you rather be shot with lead, if you're having a psychotic episode, or your cousin is dangerously drunk and disorderly? I am never justifying excessive force to be used on anyone, but Tasers are far more humane than some of the alternatives.

    {"commentId":1522530,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"jamesmirick"}
    • 3 votes
    Reply#6 - Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:53 AM EST
    {"commentId":1522623,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

    Jim, Thanks alot for your comments. Its nice to find someone that has some real knowledge.

    5. I'm not sure what statement by Taser is stating that they have a high misfire or failure rate; we have never had a misfire. You do, however, have to hit the subject and get penetration.

    That was a quote from Rick Smith, CEO of Taser International that he gave I beleive to Forbes or Money Magazine. He only mentioned failure rate I think, that would take some searching thru my history log to find that one, it was talking about the profits from YE 2006 if I remember.

    Kinda surprised about Software in a Taser. I assumed it was basically a battery and converter !

    {"commentId":1522623,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
    • 2 votes
    #6.1 - Fri Feb 29, 2008 11:19 AM EST
    {"commentId":1522908,"authorDomain":"jamesmirick"}

    Surprisingly, it is fairly complex. For example, the actual shock cycle is 5 seconds long, and the waveform the unit generates is not just an el blasto, it's a carefully shaped charge that mimics the nerve impulses in your voluntary nervous system (which is why it has essentially no impact on your heart) with the objective of simply overriding them and making your muscles lock up as if you were doing isometric exercises. Hence, you topple over and are generally quite disoriented. Because of this waveform, the actual amount of electricity it uses is amazingly small.

    If the darts don't get skin contact, the unit figures this out by measuring your resistance, and before it starts the shock cycle it generates a higher zap that opens an ionization channel between the dart and the skin (that is, through your clothes), when that channel is opened, it starts the shock. But it in effect ionizes at each dart separately so the ionization charge doesn't course through your body, only the disabling charge. It does this in less than 1/2 second after firing.

    Also, since the darts have wires connected to them, there are about 6 different cartridges, based on usage range. In this situation (Minneapolis), it's possible that he was too far away for the cartridge he was using and they ran out of wire before they embedded.

    {"commentId":1522908,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"jamesmirick"}
    • 2 votes
    #6.2 - Fri Feb 29, 2008 12:19 PM EST
    {"commentId":1522961,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

    I had no idea that it had any "smarts" at all, from what I had heard, which was clearly false was that it was a set 50KV charge, no sensing circuit and two versions, one was a 5 second blast, the other was trigger controlled for as long as you held the trigger. The second option, I did not like the sound of...

    So what does happen if a person is lets say very small in weight or there was another case of a 280 pound woman, that even after 8 taser shots, it did not seem to effect her. (She also had alot of alcohol) Does it have any mass sensing or adjusting logic ? Just from a large resistor viewpoint, I would think a physically small (in weight) person would get more of a zap then a large one as less area to dissipate the power. Any feelings on that one ?

    {"commentId":1522961,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
    • 2 votes
    #6.3 - Fri Feb 29, 2008 12:29 PM EST
    {"commentId":1523141,"authorDomain":"stacym"}

    Taser training? I'm scared of you now. ;)

    Seriously though, interesting info, Jim. Thanks for commenting.

    {"commentId":1523141,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"stacym"}
    • 2 votes
    #6.4 - Fri Feb 29, 2008 1:04 PM EST
    {"commentId":1523335,"authorDomain":"jamesmirick"}

    It does give you a 50,000-volt charge, but the current (amperes) is very small, about what you get in two or three doorknob shocks at home, which are also in the 30,000 to 50,000 volt range. What makes the difference is that the charge is mimicking your nerve impulses, and it's just strong enough to override them.

    The units are programmed to deliver a 5-second charge, then they need a couple of seconds to refill the capacitors, then they can fire again. If you hold down the trigger, nothing happens until you release it. Once it's refilled, you can deliver another shock assuming the darts are still in place.

    The subject's weight is not an issue, your body doesn't "soak up" the electricity. The actual amount of electricity is so small -- a pacemaker puts out about 100 times as much every beat -- and it's just running between the two darts, wherever they are. It doesn't reach very far away from that path. Optimally, you want the darts to be as far apart as possible so it involves more muscles and more nerves. So you'd like one in the shoulder, one in their heel. That's why there are several cartridges, because the darts are fired at a slight angle to each other to give spread. People who "aren't effected" by Tasers either didn't have the darts in them, or they were too close together. There are people who aren't effected by Mace but a Taser just overrides your voluntary nervous system -- it's not mainly pain compliance -- regardless of your other condition.

    Now if you're drunk enough, or psychotic, or whatever, you might be able to get right back up again and start fighting again, but if you're getting that shot you are out of the ballgame for the duraton of the shot. One of the training videos was of a huge and muscley inmate at Oak Park Heights who was on a rampage including literally throwing officers around. The first shot knocked him off his feet, but he was still getting up. The second charge really flattened him but he was still strongly resisting being cuffed, and after the third shot he was pleading with them to stop. But three shots is very unusual.

    {"commentId":1523335,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"jamesmirick"}
    • 3 votes
    #6.5 - Fri Feb 29, 2008 1:39 PM EST
    {"commentId":1523406,"authorDomain":"jamesmirick"}
    I'm scared of you now. ;)

    You may relax . . . the officer still has to actually hit the subject with the darts. I am not a frightfully accurate shot, especially with lots of adrenalin in use!

    {"commentId":1523406,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"jamesmirick"}
    • 3 votes
    #6.6 - Fri Feb 29, 2008 1:50 PM EST
    {"commentId":1527049,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

    Whew.....Glad they did not let you practice on your aim then. So as long as your aim is rotten, your still welcome to visit my column :-)

    {"commentId":1527049,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
    • 2 votes
    #6.7 - Sat Mar 1, 2008 9:32 AM EST
    {"commentId":1528457,"authorDomain":"DrKnow"}

    I was a deputy sheriff before tasers. We learned to use the baton (night stick) to fend off attackers. It takes constant practice to be sharp with such weapons. Just as it takes constant practice to be proficient with a hand gun or rifle. The police do not have enough time to become more than minimally proficient with any of these. The existence of the taser sometimes replaces the perceived need to train with a night stick.

    It takes a lot of practice to be willing to let someone just come 'close' with a knife. It takes a lot of practice to have the confidence that you can keep them just missing. Being attacked automatically invokes a heightened response.

    The close confines of a kitchen limit the responses an officer can chose. This is another case where the lapel camera would provide a lot of good information.

    {"commentId":1528457,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"DrKnow"}
    • 4 votes
    #6.8 - Sat Mar 1, 2008 4:55 PM EST
    {"commentId":1528746,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

    You were a sheriff ? I never would have guessed that in a million years....

    {"commentId":1528746,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
    • 1 vote
    #6.9 - Sat Mar 1, 2008 6:24 PM EST
    {"commentId":1528766,"authorDomain":"DrKnow"}

    Ya'll ingineers think ya are so smart. Take my pencil and write what I tell you to on your ticket...

    {"commentId":1528766,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"DrKnow"}
    • 1 vote
    #6.10 - Sat Mar 1, 2008 6:29 PM EST
    {"commentId":1528802,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

    Mr. Riggs was only pretending to go 120 mph in his Corvette in that 45 mph zone, his recorded *cough* speed was 44.9 mph.

    Officer Know

    {"commentId":1528802,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
    • 1 vote
    #6.11 - Sat Mar 1, 2008 6:40 PM EST
    {"commentId":1534169,"authorDomain":"jamesmirick"}
    The existence of the taser sometimes replaces the perceived need to train with a night stick.

    Our officers very seldom use a baton although they're all trained in them. And batons are designed to significantly injure people, they often inflict lasting injuries (caved-in joints or major muscle trauma), and can become lethal force from a legal standpoint -- e.g. blows to the neck or head, or to the groin. They are also primarily "pain compliance" and some people who are drugged or insane are very insensitive to pain. And as Dr. Know points out aptly, you have to be close-in to use them.

    Tasers just make your muscles stop working and 99% of the time that's the end of the fight right there.

    {"commentId":1534169,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"jamesmirick"}
    • 1 vote
    #6.12 - Mon Mar 3, 2008 10:08 AM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":1526433,"authorDomain":"patsym546"}

    wow-I never knew any of that. I also would NOT like to get a Taser!

    {"commentId":1526433,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"patsym546"}
    • 2 votes
    Reply#7 - Sat Mar 1, 2008 2:43 AM EST
    {"commentId":1527057,"authorDomain":"TeddRi"}

    I think its one of those little pleasures I would like to skip. I have been zapped enough times by electricity to know it hurts.

    {"commentId":1527057,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"TeddRi"}
    • 2 votes
    #7.1 - Sat Mar 1, 2008 9:33 AM EST
    {"commentId":1529842,"authorDomain":"patsym546"}

    Me, too. I've grabbed enough electric fences to know I don't like it!

    {"commentId":1529842,"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815","authorDomain":"patsym546"}
      #7.2 - Sun Mar 2, 2008 12:15 AM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":1533648,"authorDomain":"Pasi"}
      PasiDeleted
      {"canLink":false,"threadId":"225840","isPrivate":false}
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      {"threadId":"225840","contentId":"1328815"}
      Start TrackingStart Tracking
      Stop TrackingStop Tracking